From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noojin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 19, 2003
855 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 5D03-2277.

Opinion filed September 19, 2003.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, J. Preston Silvernail, Judge.

Bobby Jack Noojin, Jr., Bristol, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.


Bobby Jack Noojin, Jr., appeals the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion in which he asserts claims concerning the lack of effective assistance of his trial counsel and the involuntariness of his plea. Mr. Noojin is not a stranger to this court. In addition to his direct appeal and a prior 3.850 motion, we have also considered his two petitions for habeas corpus and his petition for mandamus.

Case Nos. 99-1663, 00-2205, 02-2759, 02-2414, 03-1499.

His current appeal is successive and improper. Accordingly, we warn Mr. Noojin against filing additional successive pleadings in this court regarding his conviction. See Polk v. State, 820 So.2d 456 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). His attempt to do so may result in an order instructing the Clerk not to accept further pro se pleadings regarding this case unless signed by an attorney licensed to practice law in Florida.

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W. and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Noojin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 19, 2003
855 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Noojin v. State

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY JACK NOOJIN, JR. Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 19, 2003

Citations

855 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

McCullough v. State

Should he choose to do so, this court will order him to show cause why he should not be barred from filing…