From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nolley v. State Neill

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
May 31, 1923
252 S.W. 821 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Opinion

No. 1503.

May 31, 1923.

Appeal from District Court, Eastland County; E. A. Hill, Judge.

Action by the State of Texas, on the relation of D. J. Neill and others, against S.E. Nolley. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Case dismissed.

Burkett, Orr McCarty, of Eastland, for appellant.

Turner Seaberry and Carl P. Springer, all of Eastland, for appellees.


This action was brought on the 4th day of October, 1922, to remove appellant from the office of sheriff of Eastland county; the application alleging incompetency and official misconduct. On application of relators, the trial court entered an order temporarily removing appellant from exercising the functions of the office, and appointed another to discharge the duties of the office, and fixed the bond of the appointee, conditioned as required by law, which bond was duly given, and the appointee qualified as sheriff.

Appellant excepted to the order of temporary suspension from the office, gave notice of appeal, and filed a supersedeas bond on appeal.

The case is not briefed by either side.

We think it is sufficient to say that the office of sheriff, then held by appellant, became vacant at the general election held in the year 1922, and any question of appellant's right to continue in the office ceased with the holding of the general election.

For reason stated, under the authority of McWhorter v. Northcutt et al., 94 Tex. 86. 58 S.W. 720, as to the order to be here entered, the case is dismissed, and the costs taxed against appellant.


Summaries of

Nolley v. State Neill

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
May 31, 1923
252 S.W. 821 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)
Case details for

Nolley v. State Neill

Case Details

Full title:NOLLEY v. STATE ex rel. NEILL et al

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso

Date published: May 31, 1923

Citations

252 S.W. 821 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Citing Cases

Hill-Behan Lbr. Co. v. Skrainka Const. Co.

Mo. Constitution, Art. II, Sec. 21. (2) Appellant's private property will be "taken" within the meaning of…