N.J. Power Light Co. v. Morris Cty. Bd. of Taxation

Full title: NEW JERSEY POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. MORRIS COUNTY BOARD OF…

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Dec 3, 1942

29 A.2d 141 (N.J. 1942)

129 N.J.L. 253

Opinion

Argued May 21, 1942 —

Decided December 3, 1942.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 128 N.J.L. 194.

For the respondent, Wall, Haight, Carey Hartpence.

For the appellants, Edward R. McGlynn and Elmer S. King.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.