From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nixon v. Credit Cars, Corp.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 17, 2017
No. 16-4120 (8th Cir. Jul. 17, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-4120

07-17-2017

Douglas A. Nixon; Piaowaka C. Windwolf Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Credit Cars, an Arkansas Corporation Defendant Brent Manning's Quality Preowned, Inc., doing business as Brent Manning's Credit Cars, Inc. Defendant - Appellee Brett Tharp Defendant Truity Federal Credit Union Defendant - Appellee Kelly Diven, individually and as owner and an officer of Trudity Federal Credit Union, doing business as Trudity Credit Union Affiliated, Springdale, AR, also known as Trudity Credit Union, Bartlesville, OK; Brent Manning Defendants


Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville [Unpublished] Before LOKEN, ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Arkansas residents Douglas Nixon and Piaowaka Windwolf appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to one defendant and dismissing the claims against other defendants in their pro se action arising out of a used car purchase. Upon careful de novo review, see Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (dismissal for failure to state a claim reviewed de novo); Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. --------


Summaries of

Nixon v. Credit Cars, Corp.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 17, 2017
No. 16-4120 (8th Cir. Jul. 17, 2017)
Case details for

Nixon v. Credit Cars, Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Douglas A. Nixon; Piaowaka C. Windwolf Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Credit…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jul 17, 2017

Citations

No. 16-4120 (8th Cir. Jul. 17, 2017)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Kershentsef

There is little precedent on this point, and district courts are divided. One district court in Arkansas…