Opinion
Civil Action No. 05-4007 (JAG).
May 9, 2006
ORDER
This matter comes before this Court on plaintiffs' motion to remand this case to the Superior Court of New Jersey, and Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo having issued a Report and Recommendation ("RR"), pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) and L. CIV. R. 72.1(a)(2), wherein she recommended that this Court deny the motion; and said RR having been filed on January 23, 2006; and the time within which to object to the RR having expired; and no objection having been made by either party; and it appearing that a magistrate judge's recommended disposition of a dispositive motion is subject to de novo review, In re U.S. Healthcare, 159 F.3d 142, 145-46 (3d Cir. 1998); Temptations, Inc. v. Wager, 26 F. Supp. 2d 740, 743 (D.N.J. 1998); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); and this Court having reviewed the parties' submissions and the RR under the appropriate de novo standard; and good cause appearing,
IT IS on this 8th day of May, 2006,
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Arleo's RR is adopted as the opinion of the Court; and
This Court notes that the correct citation to this Court's opinion in Orlick v. J.D. Carton Son, Inc. is 144 F. Supp. 2d 337.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to remand be DENIED; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order be served on all parties within seven (7) days of the date of this Order.