From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nihalani v. Tekhomes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1991
177 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 4, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.).


Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Tekhomes, Inc., is dismissed (see, CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that on the appeal by Robert P. Lynn, Jr., the order is reversed, on the law, that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him is granted, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant Robert P. Lynn, Jr., is awarded one bill of costs.

It is well settled that "[u]nder ordinary circumstances, an attorney who does not represent a party may only be held liable to that party upon a showing of fraud or collusion, or a malicious or tortious act" (Krasne v. Gedell, 147 A.D.2d 616, 618; see also, Fried v. Bower Gardner, 46 N.Y.2d 765, 767; Hussie v Bressler, 122 A.D.2d 113). There was no showing in the record in this case that the attorney Robert P. Lynn, Jr., acted fraudulently, collusively, maliciously or tortiously in advising his client, who in turn counseled another party to break its contract with the plaintiffs. Hence, the Supreme Court erred in refusing to dismiss the complaint against the attorney. Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nihalani v. Tekhomes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1991
177 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Nihalani v. Tekhomes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MOHAN NIHALANI et al., Respondents, v. TEKHOMES, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
575 N.Y.S.2d 698

Citing Cases

Marshel v. Farley

Since no cause of action to recover damages for fraud will arise when the only fraud charged relates to a…

In re Fogarty

There is no reason to believe that passers-by would not have assisted him. Had he called for such aid, he…