Opinion
Case No: 2:13-cv-365-FtM-29CM
07-10-2014
JULI NIESEN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on consideration of Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #25), filed on June 18, 2014, recommending that the Decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.
The Court reviews the Commissioner's decision to determine if it is supported by substantial evidence and based upon proper legal standards. Crawford v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 363 F.3d 1155, 1158 (11th Cir. 2004)(citing Lewis v. Callahan, 125 F.3d 1436, 1439 (11th Cir. 1997)). Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla but less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion. Moore v. Barnhart, 405 F.3d 1208, 1211 (11th Cir. 2005)(citing Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1158-59). Even if the evidence preponderates against the Commissioner's findings, the Court must affirm if the decision reached is supported by substantial evidence. Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1158-59 (citing Martin v. Sullivan, 894 F.2d 1520, 1529 (11th Cir. 1990)). The Court does not decide facts anew, make credibility judgments, reweigh the evidence, or substitute its judgment for that of the Commissioner. Moore, 405 F.3d at 1211 (citing Bloodsworth v. Heckler, 703 F.2d 1233, 1239 (11th Cir. 1983)); Dyer v. Barnhart, 395 F.3d 1206, 1210 (11th Cir. 2005)(citing Phillips v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d 1232, 1240 n.8 (11th Cir. 2004)). The Court reviews the Commissioner's conclusions of law under a de novo standard of review. Ingram v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 496 F.3d 1253, 1260 (11th Cir. 2007)(citing Martin, 894 F.2d at 1529).
After an independent review, the Court agrees with the findings and recommendations in the Report and Recommendation. The Court agrees that the vocational expert's testimony was supported by substantial evidence, and that the ALJ did not err by relying on the testimony.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #25) is accepted and adopted by the Court, and the findings incorporated herein.
2. The Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed.
3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 10th day of July, 2014.
__________
JOHN E. STEELE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies:
Hon. Carol Mirando
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record