From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 10, 1951
242 S.W.2d 396 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)

Summary

In Nichols v. State, 242 S.W.2d 396 (Tex.Crim.App. 1951), the court held that the word "automobile," as used by the legislature in describing the offense of driving while intoxicated, "is a generic term which includes the motor vehicle commonly known as a `truck.'"

Summary of this case from Opinion No. GA-0179

Opinion

No. 25361.

June 20, 1951. Rehearing Denied October 10, 1951.

Appeal from the County Court, Potter County, E. E. Jordan, J.

Reynold M. Gardner, Amarillo, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.


The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The sole question presented for review is whether an indictment charging one with driving an automobile while intoxicated will support a conviction when the proof shows that he was driving a truck. As will be seen, a disposition of this case hinges upon the definition of the word "automobile."

Ballentine's Law Dictionary with Pronunciations defines an automobile as "a wheeled vehicle, propelled by steam, electricity, or gasoline, and used for the transportation of persons or merchandise."

Bouvier's Law Dictionary, Rawle's 3rd Edition, says that an automobile is "a vehicle for the carriage of passengers or freight, propelled by its own motor."

Black's Law Dictionary, 3rd Edition, defines automobile as "a vehicle for the transportation of persons or property on the highway, carrying its own motive power and not operated upon fixed tracks."

Webster's New International Dictionary, 2d Edition, Unabridged, gives us the following definition: "An automobile vehicle or mechanism; esp., a self-propelled vehicle suitable for use on a street or roadway."

Other jurisdictions have given the term "automobile" a broad interpretation. In Stanley v. Tomlin, 143 Va. 187, 129 S.E. 379, 380, it was held that "`Automobile' is general name adopted by proper approval for all forms of self-propelling vehicles for use on highways and streets for general freight and passenger service; a wheeled vehicle propelled by gasoline, steam, or electricity."

The term "automobile" has been held to include a "truck" in the following cases: Kellaher v. City of Portland, 57 Or. 575, 110 P. 492, 112 P. 1076; Wiese v. Polzer, 212 Wis. 337, 248 N.W. 113; Bethlehem Motors Corporation v. Flynt, 178 N.C. 399, 100 S.E. 693; Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Roland, 45 Ga. App. 467, 165 S.E. 293.

The Kansas City Court of Appeals in Hoover v. National Casualty Co., 236 Mo. App. 1093, 162 S.W.2d 363, approved the Bouvier's Law Dictionary definition set forth above.

In the light of the foregoing definitions and decisions, it is the holding of this Court that the term "automobile" as used by the Legislature in defining the offense of driving while intoxicated is a generic term which includes the motor vehicle commonly known as a "truck."

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Nichols v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 10, 1951
242 S.W.2d 396 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)

In Nichols v. State, 242 S.W.2d 396 (Tex.Crim.App. 1951), the court held that the word "automobile," as used by the legislature in describing the offense of driving while intoxicated, "is a generic term which includes the motor vehicle commonly known as a `truck.'"

Summary of this case from Opinion No. GA-0179
Case details for

Nichols v. State

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLS v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 10, 1951

Citations

242 S.W.2d 396 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)
156 Tex. Crim. 364

Citing Cases

Swanner v. State

We find no merit in this contention nor in his further contention that the indictment will not support this…

Small v. State

Several Texas cases have defined "automobile" in a broad context. In Nichols v. State, 156 Tex.Crim. R., 242…