From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. Kirkpatrick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 3, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-03-2017

In the Matter of William M. NICHOLS, Petitioner, v. Michael KIRKPATRICK, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

William M. Nichols, Alden, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


William M. Nichols, Alden, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ponder v. Annucci, 128 A.D.3d 1255, 1255, 8 N.Y.S.3d 500 [2015] ; Matter of Ramos v. Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 123 A.D.3d 1215, 1216, 995 N.Y.S.2d 866 [2014] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, ROSE, AARONS and RUMSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nichols v. Kirkpatrick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 3, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Nichols v. Kirkpatrick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of William M. NICHOLS, Petitioner, v. Michael KIRKPATRICK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 3, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
56 N.Y.S.3d 903

Citing Cases

Diaz v. Venettozzi

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed,…