From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 22, 2013
Civil No. 3:11-2927 DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:11-2927 DCN

02-22-2013

DENNIS E. NICHOLS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

On February 21, 2013, this court issued an Order adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and reversed and remanded the decision of the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative action. On February 21, 2013, the plaintiff filed his objections to the Report and Recommendation. It appears from a review of the file and plaintiff's objections that said objections were timely. Now therefore,

IT IS HEREWITH ORDERED that this court's Order filed on February 21, 2013, reversing and remanding the decision of the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), is herewith vacated, and this matter is herewith reinstated for consideration of plaintiff's objections.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________

DAVID C. NORTON

United States District Judge
February 22, 2012
Charleston, South Carolina


Summaries of

Nichols v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 22, 2013
Civil No. 3:11-2927 DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Nichols v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS E. NICHOLS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Feb 22, 2013

Citations

Civil No. 3:11-2927 DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2013)