From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nguyen v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 15, 2024
22-cv-06145-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-06145-JD

03-15-2024

VELVET NHUNG NGUYEN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JAMES DONATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In the order of dismissal filed on February 2, 2024, the Court directed pro se plaintiff Velvet Nguyen to file an amended complaint by February 29, 2024, and advised that “[f]ailure to file an amended complaint by the deadline will result in dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).” Dkt. No. 35 at 1. Two weeks have passed since that deadline, and Nguyen has not filed an amended complaint. On February 23, 2024, she filed a letter to “inform of [her] decision to file an amended complaint,” but she has not done so. Dkt. No. 36.

Consequently, the case is dismissed and closed pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to follow a court order. No further filings will be accepted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nguyen v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 15, 2024
22-cv-06145-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Nguyen v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:VELVET NHUNG NGUYEN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 15, 2024

Citations

22-cv-06145-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2024)