From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. G.D. Searle and Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1975
50 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

November 10, 1975


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Searle and Co. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 29, 1975, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction. Order reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Plaintiff served the summons and complaint upon appellant pursuant to section 307 Bus. Corp. of the Business Corporation Law by personally serving the Secretary of State of the State of New York on April 8, 1974 and by mailing a copy to defendant G.D. Searle and Co. (not appellant) in Skokie, Illinois, on or about April 12, 1974. A year later, on April 9, 1975, appellant made its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. It appears from the record on this appeal that appellant was incorporated under the laws of Delaware and that Puerto Rico is the only place where it actually has an office and does business. Accordingly, the full requirements of section 307 (subd [b], par [2]) of the Business Corporation Law were not satisfied and the motion to dismiss should have been granted (see Koepke v Bilnor Corp., 55 Misc.2d 928). Rabin, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Margett and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Newman v. G.D. Searle and Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1975
50 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Newman v. G.D. Searle and Co.

Case Details

Full title:LIANE S. NEWMAN, Respondent, v. G.D. SEARLE AND Co. et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.

Apart from the filing defects which it does not address, the majority here in effect equates service on a…

Stewart v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.

ed to proceed directly to the end of subdivision (b) (2)'s "last known address" option, it was not correctly…