From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newell v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 31, 2002
300 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2694

December 31, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered April 30, 2002, which denied the motion of defendants-appellants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them and the cross motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Michael V. Kaplen, for Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents.

Edward S. Leonard, for Defendants-Respondents-Appellants.

Before: SAXE, J.P., SULLIVAN, ELLERIN, LERNER, GONZALEZ, JJ.


In this action to recover for injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiffs when the car in which they were riding became disabled on a highway and was struck from behind, triable issues of material fact preclude a grant of summary judgment in favor of either defendant movants or plaintiff cross movants. These issues include whether the driver of the car that became disabled was negligent, in either driving too fast or inattentively, and by reason of any such negligence failed to avoid the debris to which the vehicle's breakdown is attributed, thus causing or contributing to the risk of the ensuing collision (see Sutton v. Carolei, 244 A.D.2d 156).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Newell v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 31, 2002
300 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Newell v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:KYREE NEWELL, ETC., ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. JUAN C…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 365

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Elias-Tejada

See Lindgren v. New York City Hous. Auth., 269 A.D.2d 299, 704 N.Y.S.2d 30 (1st Dep't 2000). Given the…

Perez v. Levine

On these facts, no fair interpretation of the evidence could have yielded a determination that plaintiff was…