From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newbury v. Lawrence

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 16, 1926
134 A. 918 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Submitted May 28, 1926 —

Decided September 16, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 267.

For the appellant, James Mercer Davis.

For the respondents, Stokes McDermott.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Newbury v. Lawrence

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 16, 1926
134 A. 918 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Newbury v. Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM T. NEWBURY, APPELLANT, v. RULIFF V. LAWRENCE, JUDGE, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 16, 1926

Citations

134 A. 918 (N.J. 1926)
134 A. 918

Citing Cases

State v. Hunter

In any event, there can be no question of the jurisdiction of the municipal court over the subject matter.…

State v. Boutote

The last paragraph of Judge McGeehan's opinion in this case reads as follows: "When a case is tried de novo…