From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Central and Hudson River Rail. v. Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1913
157 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

June, 1913.


Without any expression or intimation of opinion upon the merits of the controversy, we affirm the exercise of discretion by the Special Term in sending back the report to the commissioners by affirmance of the order, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Matter of Board of Water Commissioners, 55 App. Div. 77; Matter of Prospect Park C.I.R.R. Co., 85 N.Y. 489. ) Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

New York Central and Hudson River Rail. v. Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1913
157 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

New York Central and Hudson River Rail. v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1913

Citations

157 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)