From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neunzig v. Cornett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 21, 2000
761 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D99-4178.

Opinion filed June 21, 2000.

Petition for writ of mandamus to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; George A. Brescher, Judge; L.T. No. 99-16815 CACE.

William Philip Neunzig, Hollywood, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We deny the petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to petitioner seeking further relief in the trial court. Prior to hearing petitioner's underlying motion, the trial court properly referred it to mediation, see section 44.102(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1999), and Kurtz v. Kurtz, 538 So.2d 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); petitioner alleges, however, that respondent refused to attend. There is no indication that the trial court was made aware of this alleged fact so the court would then have the opportunity to compel respondent to attend, set a hearing on the underlying motion regardless of the lack of mediation, or take other appropriate action. This ruling is also without prejudice to petitioner refiling for mandamus relief if, in the future, the trial court delays unreasonably in acting on petitioner's motion for contempt.

WARNER, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Neunzig v. Cornett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 21, 2000
761 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Neunzig v. Cornett

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM PHILIP NEUNZIG, Petitioner v. CATHLEEN CORNETT, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 21, 2000

Citations

761 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)