From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neuner v. Newburgh City School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1983
92 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

March 14, 1983


In an action for the refund of taxes paid in excess of the constitutional taxation limitation, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), entered January 20, 1982, which granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment denied and summary judgment granted to defendant dismissing the complaint. Special Term's reliance on People ex rel. Wessel, Nickel Gross v. Craig ( 236 N.Y. 100) for the proposition that any payment of a tax after it becomes a lien is a payment made under duress is misplaced. That case was decided before the effective date of section 1312 Real Prop. Tax of the Real Property Tax Law, which provides that school taxes become liens immediately upon the final adoption of the school tax roll by the school authorities. There is no indication that People ex rel. Wessel, Nickel Gross v. Craig ( supra) was meant to apply to the situation where a lien arises as soon as a tax becomes due. In City of Rochester v. Chiarella ( 86 A.D.2d 110, app dsmd 56 N.Y.2d 923) the Fourth Department held that when a lien arises as soon as a tax becomes due, payment of a tax after it has become a lien does not amount to a payment made under duress. It is considered to be a voluntary payment and an appropriate protest is necessary, if the taxpayer is to recover the taxes paid. We agree. In order for a protest to be characterized as appropriate, it must be in writing ( City of Rochester v. Chiarella, supra) and must have been made at the time of payment ( Riverdale Country School v. City of New York, 11 N.Y.2d 741). Since at the time of the collection of the taxes in the instant case, the plaintiffs concededly did not make a written protest, they cannot be said to have made an appropriate protest. Therefore, Special Term erred in granting plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Instead, summary judgment should be granted to defendant (CPLR 3212, subd [b]). Mollen, P.J., Damiani, Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Neuner v. Newburgh City School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1983
92 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Neuner v. Newburgh City School District

Case Details

Full title:VALERIE A. NEUNER et al., Respondents, v. NEWBURGH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1983

Citations

92 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Overbay, LLC v. Berkman, Henoch, Peterson, Peddy & Fenchel, P.C.

Not just any form of protest is sufficient to overcome the voluntary payment doctrine. Rather, "[i]n order…

ECI Fin. Corp. v. Resurrection Temple of Our Lord, Inc.

"There is a presumption that payments are voluntary" ( Overbay, LLC v. Berkman, Henoch, Peterson, Peddy &…