From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1959
9 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

December 31, 1959


Appeal from so much of a resettled order as denied a motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint on appellant, a foreign corporation, on the ground that it was not "doing business" here. Resettled order modified by striking therefrom everything beginning with the word "denied" in the second ordering paragraph and ending with the words "the Official Referee" and by substituting therefor the word "granted". As so modified, resettled order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, appellant was not "doing business" in this State ( Miller v. Surf Props., 4 N.Y.2d 475; Pennrich Co. v. Juniata Hosiery Mills, 247 N.Y. 592; Hamlin v. Barrett Co., 246 N.Y. 554). Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [ 18 Misc.2d 234.]


Summaries of

Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1959
9 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN NEU, Respondent, v. TEEN TIME, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1959

Citations

9 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Waverly Chemical Co. v. Thermal Research & Engineering Corp.

In an action to recover damages for breach of warranty, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court,…