From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neu v. Heim Middle School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 18, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: DENMAN, P. J., PINE, WISNER, HURLBUTT AND CALLAHAN, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Triable issues of fact exist whether plaintiff Eric Neu assumed the risks involved in participating in his school's extracurricular wrestling program, as measured against the background of his skill and experience (see, Benitez v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 73 N.Y.2d 650, 657)

We note, however, that the court's statement that defendant coach "had more than one wrestling match going on at a time, and his attention was diverted elsewhere" at the time of the accident improperly resolves a disputed issue of fact that could impact the cause of action for negligent supervision. It is well settled that the function of a court on summary judgment is issue finding, not issue determination (see, Powell v. Tarantino Foods, 234 A.D.2d 989).


Summaries of

Neu v. Heim Middle School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Neu v. Heim Middle School

Case Details

Full title:GARY A. NEU, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF ERIC NEU, AN INFANT OVER 14…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 818