From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nesmith v. Corrections Corporation of America

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division
Aug 23, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV507-043 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 23, 2007)

Summary

holding private contractor who runs prison cannot be held liable under § 1983 on respondeat superior or vicarious liability basis

Summary of this case from Santais v. Corecivic, Inc.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV507-043.

August 23, 2007


ORDER


After an independent review, the undersigned concurs with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which Objections have been filed. In his Objections, Plaintiff asserts Corrections Corporation of America monitors its prison facilities and has no choice "but to know and therefore condone the amount of use of force at Coffee Correctional Facility." (Doc. No. 16, p. 1). Plaintiff also asserts James Donald, as the Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections, " should be aware of the number of use of force actions." (Id., p. 2) (emphasis added).

For the same reasons detailed in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Objections are without merit. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's claims against Corrections Corporation of America, Coffee Correctional Facility, and Commissioner James Donald are DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nesmith v. Corrections Corporation of America

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division
Aug 23, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV507-043 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 23, 2007)

holding private contractor who runs prison cannot be held liable under § 1983 on respondeat superior or vicarious liability basis

Summary of this case from Santais v. Corecivic, Inc.

holding private contractor who runs prison cannot be held liable under § 1983 on respondeat superior or vicarious liability basis

Summary of this case from Anderson v. Hall

holding that CCA, as private contractor who runs prison, cannot be held liable under Section 1983 on respondeat superior or vicarious liability basis

Summary of this case from Newell v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

holding that CCA, as private contractor who runs prison, cannot be held liable under Section 1983 on respondeat superior or vicarious liability basis

Summary of this case from Santais v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

holding that CCA, as private contractor who runs prison, cannot be held liable under § 1983 on respondeat superior or vicarious liability basis

Summary of this case from Mosley v. Medlin
Case details for

Nesmith v. Corrections Corporation of America

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM IRA NESMITH, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division

Date published: Aug 23, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV507-043 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 23, 2007)

Citing Cases

Santais v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

However, supervisors, employers, and private contractors cannot be sued under Section 1983 simply on a theory…

Santais v. Corecivic, Inc.

However, supervisors, employers, and private contractors cannot be sued under § 1983 simply on a theory of…