From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neroni v. Follender

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 28, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 78058 (N.Y. 2016)

Opinion

06-28-2016

Tatiana NERONI, Appellant, v. Jonathan S. FOLLENDER et al., Respondents.


Reported below, 137 A.D.3d 1336, 26 N.Y.S.3d 621.

Motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Judges Stein and Fahey, dismissed as academic; motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Chief Judge DiFiore, dismissed upon the ground that the Court has no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal of the Chief Judge is referred to her for individual consideration and determination. Chief Judge DiFiore denies the referred motion for recusal. On the Court's own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the December 2013 and April 2014 Supreme Court orders, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it does not lie, and, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for ancillary relief denied.

Judges STEIN and FAHEY took no part.


Summaries of

Neroni v. Follender

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 28, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 78058 (N.Y. 2016)
Case details for

Neroni v. Follender

Case Details

Full title:Tatiana NERONI, Appellant, v. Jonathan S. FOLLENDER et al., Respondents.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Jun 28, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 78058 (N.Y. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 78058
27 N.Y.3d 1147
57 N.E.3d 1099

Citing Cases

Sprole v. Sprole

The justice presiding over the divorce action and Gingold's motion was an Acting Supreme Court Justice (see…

Sprole v. Sprole

continuation of the matrimonial action (see generally Holloway v. Holloway, 35 A.D.3d 1126, 1128, 827…