From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. State Board of Accountancy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 23, 1978
355 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. II-58.

February 23, 1978.

Petition for review from the State Board of Accountancy.

Melvin N. Greenberg, Byron G. Peterson, of Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Quentel, Wright Wolff, Miami, for petitioners.

James S. Quincey, of Clayton, Duncan, Johnston, Quincey, Ireland, Felder Gadd, Gainesville, and Parker D. Thomson, of Paul Thomson, Miami, for respondent.


This cause is before the court on the petition of Charles E. Nelson and Arthur Anderson Co., for review of preliminary, procedural, or intermediate agency action pursuant to § 120.68(1), Florida Statutes (1975), and on the State Board of Accountancy's motion to dismiss the petition for review. Pursuant to § 473.261(4), Florida Statutes (1975), respondent filed a complaint against the petitioners purportedly based upon findings by respondent that petitioners had violated certain statutes and rules of respondent. The complaint is now pending before the Division of Administrative Hearings under § 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (1975), upon petitioners' request for hearing.

Petitioners contend that respondent Board failed to comply with requirements of law essential to probable cause findings against petitioner. Respondent, by its motion to dismiss, contends that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction under § 120.68, Florida Statutes, in that review of the final agency decision will provide an adequate remedy to petitioners. It appears that petitioners have raised before the hearing officer the question which they now raise here, and the hearing officer has not ruled upon such question. Petitioners are in doubt whether or not the hearing officer has authority to make such ruling and by this proceeding seeks this Court's ruling in lieu of a ruling by the hearing officer.

It is our ruling that the hearing officer has authority to make such preliminary ruling which will, of course, be subject to ultimate review by this Court; that such ultimate review of final agency action will provide an adequate remedy to petitioner.

The petition for review is dismissed.

BOYER, J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Nelson v. State Board of Accountancy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 23, 1978
355 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Nelson v. State Board of Accountancy

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. NELSON AND ARTHUR ANDERSON CO., PETITIONERS, v. STATE BOARD OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 23, 1978

Citations

355 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Fox v. Fla. State Bd. of Osteopathic

There has been no hearing and the only agency action taken thus far is the denial by the hearing examiner of…

Florida Real Estate Com'n v. Frost

The petitioner urges the Hearing Officer exceeded his jurisdiction in entering that Order and says the only…