From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Fiskars Brands, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 13, 2015
No. 03:14-CV-00685-SB (D. Or. Sep. 13, 2015)

Opinion

No. 03:14-CV-00685-SB

09-13-2015

JEAN NELSON, Plaintiff, v. FISKARS BRANDS, INC., d.b.a. Gerber Legendary Blades, Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings & Recommendation (#35) on July 10, 2015, in which she recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation [35], and therefore, Defendant's motion for summary judgment [17] is granted and Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment [20] is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 13 day of September, 2015.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nelson v. Fiskars Brands, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 13, 2015
No. 03:14-CV-00685-SB (D. Or. Sep. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Nelson v. Fiskars Brands, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JEAN NELSON, Plaintiff, v. FISKARS BRANDS, INC., d.b.a. Gerber Legendary…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 13, 2015

Citations

No. 03:14-CV-00685-SB (D. Or. Sep. 13, 2015)

Citing Cases

Rozairo v. Wells Fargo Bank

Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.159(1)(c). The employee seeking leave bears the burden of establishing that he had a…

Munger v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.

Generally, "the critical test for substantively-sufficient notice is whether the information that the…