From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neglia v. Lielouka

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
32 Misc. 707 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

June, 1900.

Herman A. Brand, for appellants.

Don R. Almy, for respondent.


As the evidence showed that defendant agreed to fix the roof if plaintiffs "stayed", and that plaintiffs stayed, but defendant failed to fix the roof within a reasonable time, and that by this fault of the defendant the plaintiffs were damaged as claimed, the complaint should not have been dismissed.

As it does not appear that the plaintiffs had concluded their case on any question, except that of defendant's negligence, at the time of the dismissal, it is not necessary to consider the question of contributory negligence.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Present: TRUAX, P.J., SCOTT and DUGRO, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.


Summaries of

Neglia v. Lielouka

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
32 Misc. 707 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Neglia v. Lielouka

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL NEGLIA et al., Appellants, v . THEODORE V. LIELOUKA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1900

Citations

32 Misc. 707 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Citing Cases

Goldberg v. Engelhard

(Charter of City of Brooklyn, 1863, § 37, tit. 13, Laws of 1873, chap. 863, protecting egress to the roof and…