From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nebel v. Nebel

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 14, 1968
103 N.J. Super. 216 (App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

Decided October 14, 1968.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Union County, whose opinion is reported in 99 N.J. Super. 256.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

Mr. Colin M. Dillon argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Pollis, Williams, Pappas Dillon, attorneys).

Mr. Harold G. Pierson argued the cause for respondent.


The Chancery Division order under appeal is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Wood, 99 N.J. Super. 256. The record provides substantial support for his findings and conclusions.


Summaries of

Nebel v. Nebel

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 14, 1968
103 N.J. Super. 216 (App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Nebel v. Nebel

Case Details

Full title:JEANNE D. NEBEL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR J. NEBEL…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 14, 1968

Citations

103 N.J. Super. 216 (App. Div. 1968)
247 A.2d 27

Citing Cases

Black v. Black

denied167 N.J. 633, 772 A.2d 935 (2001) does not hold to the contrary. In Finger, supra, 335 N.J.Super. at…

Quinn v. Johnson

"A necessary education" is a fluid concept that can vary in different circumstances. Khalaf v. Khalaf, 58…