From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.C. Bowling Proprietors Ass'n v. Cooper

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Sep 25, 2020
375 N.C. 374 (N.C. 2020)

Summary

In N.C. Bowling Proprietors Ass'n, Inc. v. Cooper, 375 N.C. 374, 847 S.E.2d 745 (2020), this Court vacated a preliminary injunction that was no longer in effect because the underlying Executive Order had expired.

Summary of this case from Walker v. Wake Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Opinion

No. 314PA20

09-25-2020

NORTH CAROLINA BOWLING PROPRIETORS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Roy A. COOPER, III, in his official capacity as the Governor of North Carolina


ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a lawsuit questioning the authority of defendant Governor Roy Cooper to enforce section 8(A) of Executive Order 141 against plaintiff, the North Carolina Bowling Proprietors Association, and its 75 member entertainment facilities. See Exec. Order 141, § 8(A) (May 20, 2020). The trial court entered an interlocutory order granting a preliminary injunction on 7 July 2020 (preliminary injunction order). Defendant sought a stay of the order and its review, and this Court allowed both the stay and review. Defendant recently issued an executive order that superseded and replaced the provisions of Executive Order 141 challenged in this case. See Exec. Order 163, § 6(8) (Sept. 1, 2020). Executive Order 163 allows bowling centers to resume operations under certain specified safety protocols. See id. § 6(8)(b)(i)–(xi). Since the challenged restriction in Executive Order 141 is no longer in effect against plaintiff, we dismiss this appeal as moot, vacate the 7 July 2020 preliminary injunction order, and remand to Superior Court, Wake County.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 25th day of September, 2020.


Summaries of

N.C. Bowling Proprietors Ass'n v. Cooper

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Sep 25, 2020
375 N.C. 374 (N.C. 2020)

In N.C. Bowling Proprietors Ass'n, Inc. v. Cooper, 375 N.C. 374, 847 S.E.2d 745 (2020), this Court vacated a preliminary injunction that was no longer in effect because the underlying Executive Order had expired.

Summary of this case from Walker v. Wake Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

dismissing appeal as moot and vacating order of lower court

Summary of this case from Walker v. Wake Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

dismissing a lawsuit brought by bowling alleys as moot without considering possible exceptions after the Governor allowed the businesses to reopen

Summary of this case from Riley Drive Entm't I v. Reynolds

dismissing a lawsuit brought by bowling alleys as moot without considering possible exceptions after the Governor allowed the businesses to reopen

Summary of this case from Stand for Something Grp. Live v. Abbott
Case details for

N.C. Bowling Proprietors Ass'n v. Cooper

Case Details

Full title:NORTH CAROLINA BOWLING PROPRIETORS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ROY A. COOPER…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 25, 2020

Citations

375 N.C. 374 (N.C. 2020)
375 N.C. 374

Citing Cases

Walker v. Wake Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

While we express no opinion as to its correctness, the better practice in this circumstance is to vacate the…

Stand for Something Grp. Live v. Abbott

ntiffs failed to show that challenged orders were capable of repetition yet evading review and that, to the…