Opinion
3:19-cv-05425-BHS
07-25-2024
TIM NAY, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF MARIA GONZALEZ TORRES, and GREGORY PRICE, as Guardian ad Litem of IG, a minor, Plaintiffs, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a/ AMTRAK, et al. Defendants.
LANE POWELL PC Tim D. Wackerbarth, WSBA No. 13673 Andrew G. Yates, WSBA No. 34239 Katie D. Bass, WSBA No. 51369 Attorneys for Defendants BNSF Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Doing Business as Amtrak, Timothy Burch, and Thomas Matlock D'AMORE LAW GROUP, P.C. Thomas D/Amore, WSBA No. 22772 Benjamin Turner, WSBA No. 56427 Lake Oswego, OR 97035-2496Attorneys for Plaintiff Tim Nay, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maria Gonzalez Torres RANDY OETKEN, P.C. Randy Oetken, WSBA No. 32411 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gregory Price, as Guardian ad Litem of I.G., a Minor Child BOYD KENTER THOMAS & PARRISH LLC Mark Parish, pro hac vice, Josh Sanders, pro hac vice Attorneys for Plaintiff Tim Nay, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maria Gonzalez Torres, and Gregory Price, as Guardian ad Litem of I.G., a Minor Child
LANE POWELL PC Tim D. Wackerbarth, WSBA No. 13673 Andrew G. Yates, WSBA No. 34239 Katie D. Bass, WSBA No. 51369 Attorneys for Defendants BNSF Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Doing Business as Amtrak, Timothy Burch, and Thomas Matlock
D'AMORE LAW GROUP, P.C. Thomas D/Amore, WSBA No. 22772 Benjamin Turner, WSBA No. 56427 Lake Oswego, OR 97035-2496Attorneys for Plaintiff Tim Nay, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maria Gonzalez Torres
RANDY OETKEN, P.C. Randy Oetken, WSBA No. 32411 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gregory Price, as Guardian ad Litem of I.G., a Minor Child
BOYD KENTER THOMAS & PARRISH LLC Mark Parish, pro hac vice, Josh Sanders, pro hac vice Attorneys for Plaintiff Tim Nay, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maria Gonzalez Torres, and Gregory Price, as Guardian ad Litem of I.G., a Minor Child
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO DISCLOSE REBUTTAL EXPERT TESTIMONY UNDER FRCP 26(A)(2)
HONORABLE BENJAMIN H. SETTLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The undersigned parties hereby stipulate as follows and move this Court for an order continuing the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert testimony under FRCP 26(a)(2).
STIPULATION
1. On November 7, 2023, this Court issued an Order Setting Jury Trial and Pretrial Dates. Dkt. 127.
2. On May 28, 2024, the parties filed a Stipulated Order Extending Pretrial Dates, and this Court entered the Order on the same day. Dkt. 130.
3. The deadline to disclose rebuttal expert testimony under FRCP 26(a)(2) is currently August 16, 2024. Dkt. 130.
4. The parties have been working cooperatively to complete discovery prepare the case for trial and agree that a two-week extension is needed to disclose rebuttal expert testimony.
5. Therefore, the parties respectfully stipulate to a continuance of disclosure of rebuttal expert testimony to August 30, 2024.
6. The parties also respectfully request that this Court instruct the Clerk to issue a new order resetting the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert testimony to August 30, 2024.
ORDER
THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the Parties and the Court having considered the records and files herein, the Court does hereby find good cause to order that the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert testimony under FRCP 26(a)(2) is continued from August 16, 2024 to August 30, 2024. The remaining pretrial and trial dates remain the same.
The Clerk shall issue a new order in accordance with this Order.