From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Navicky v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 26, 2007
949 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2D05-2381.

November 22, 2006. Rehearing Denied January 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Ronald N. Ficarrotta, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Douglas S. Connor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Muir Beccue, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


In this appeal Steven Navicky claims that the trial court erred when instructing the jury on his entrapment defense. We affirm on that issue without further discussion. Navicky also complains that the court improperly taxed him with a cost pursuant to section 939.185, Florida Statutes (2004). We agree. That statute is applicable to crimes committed after July 1, 2004. Waller v. State, 911 So.2d 226, 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); see also Cutwright v. State, 934 So.2d 667, 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Navicky's crime was committed on November 23, 2003. Accordingly, we strike the $65 court cost imposed pursuant to section 939.185, and remand to the circuit court to correct the judgment.

Navicky preserved this issue for appeal by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2).

Affirmed in part, cost stricken, and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Navicky v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 26, 2007
949 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Navicky v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven K. NAVICKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 26, 2007

Citations

949 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Watts v. State

Watts argues that the trial court erred in imposing a $65 county court cost pursuant to section…

Stempler v. State

We cannot equate these costs with civil filing fees that are assessed against either the losing plaintiff or…