From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naval v. Herbert H. Lehman College

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2003
303 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-00780

Argued February 24, 2003.

March 24, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for alleged discrimination in violation of Executive Law § 290, et seq., the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), dated December 18, 2001, which granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred.

Eric I. Prusan, Mineola, N.Y., for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Patrick J. Walsh of counsel), for respondents.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the instant action as time-barred (see Matter of Queensborough Community Coll. of City Univ of N.Y. v. State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 41 N.Y.2d 926; Mitchell v. Nassau Community Coll., 265 A.D.2d 456). CPLR 205(a) is not applicable to the instant case, since the plaintiff's similar and timely-commenced Federal action was terminated by voluntary discontinuance (see Kourkoumelis v. Arnel, 238 A.D.2d 313).

S. MILLER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, ADAMS and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Naval v. Herbert H. Lehman College

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2003
303 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Naval v. Herbert H. Lehman College

Case Details

Full title:UDAY C. NAVAL, appellant, v. HERBERT H. LEHMAN COLLEGE, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 792

Citing Cases

Eb Brands Holdings, Inc. v. Mcgladrey, LLP

The plaintiff appeals. The Supreme Court properly dismissed this action as time-barred (see Zaborowski v.…

Zaborowski v. Local 74, Serv. Emps. Int'l Union

Here, in opposition to the appellant's prima facie showing that the time in which to commence this action has…