Summary
noting that although the trial court issued a minute order denying a motion to intervene, the minute order was not reduced to writing, and therefore, declining to address issues related to appellant's motion to intervene because such issues "should be brought on appeal from an Order disposing of [appellant's] Motion to Intervene"
Summary of this case from Bank of Am., N.A. v. WebbOpinion
NO. CAAP-17-0000391
06-25-2018
On the briefs: Richard T. Forrester, and Matthew P. Holm, (Forrester Legal, LLC), Honolulu, for Intervenor-Appellant. Jade Lynne Ching, Kanoelani S. Kane, and Hailialoha D. Hopkins, (Nakashima Ching LLC) for Plaintiff-Appellee.
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
Affirmed in part. Vacated in part. Vacated. Affirmed.