From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Wildlife Fed. v. U.S. Forest Serv

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 1986
801 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1986)

Opinion

No. 84-4274.

Argued May 8, 1986. Submitted August 15, 1986.

Decided September 30, 1986.

Terence L. Thatcher, National Wildlife Federation, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs/appellants.

Phillip Chadsey, Stoel, Rives, Boley, Fraser Wyse, Portland, Or., Robert R. Steenland, Jr., Claire L. McGurie, Robert L. Klarquist, Dept. of Justice, Patrick M. Hanlon, Shea Gardner, Washington, D.C., for defendants-intervenors/appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of Oregon; Gus J. Solomon, Senior United States Judge, Presiding.

Before ALARCON, REINHARDT and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.


Pursuant to the parties' Joint Report, we vacate the last clause of paragraph six of the district court's amended judgment, to wit, the words: "or in the alternative, the federal defendants must include a worst case analysis and an analysis of cumulative impacts in the environmental assessment for each timber sale in the Seven Year Action Plan." Pursuant to the Forest Service's concessions at oral argument, and upon our resolution of the issues on appeal which the parties have been unable to settle, we also vacate all of paragraph seven of the district court's amended judgment. The remainder of the judgment shall remain in effect. The appeal is dismissed.

This order is filed concurrently with an unpublished memorandum disposition, 803 F.2d 724, 9th Cir. R. 21.


Summaries of

National Wildlife Fed. v. U.S. Forest Serv

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 1986
801 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1986)
Case details for

National Wildlife Fed. v. U.S. Forest Serv

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS, v. UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 30, 1986

Citations

801 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

Wind River Multiple-Use Advocates v. Espy

" Id. Generally, as long as "the Forest Service considers the other competing uses, the courts are reluctant…

Intermountain Forest Industry Ass'n v. Lyng

The Act gives range, recreation, and wildlife an equal footing with timber production. Sierra Club v. Hardin,…