From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Steel Erection v. Hinkle

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District
May 16, 1990
553 N.E.2d 1252 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 63A04-8711-CV-338.

May 16, 1990.

Appeal from the Pike Circuit Court; Marvin D. Stratton, Judge, Cause No. 85-C-174.

Peter G. Tamulonis and John B. Drummy, Kightlinger Gary, Indianapolis, for appellant.

Bruce A. Smith, Washington, for appellee.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING


In National Steel Erection v. Hinkle (1989), Ind. App., 541 N.E.2d 288, a negligence action, we reversed and remanded for new trial because of an incorrect instruction involving the liability portion of the trial. Both parties have filed for rehearing. Hinkle asserts inter alia that no issue was raised concerning the amount of damages awarded by the jury, and therefore, the new trial should be limited to liability.

In their brief in opposition to Hinkle's petition for rehearing, National Steel Erection stipulates that the new trial should be limited to liability. We agree and grant rehearing to clarify that the new trial is to be limited to liability.

The parties' other contentions were addressed in our opinion, and we will not address them again.

SHIELDS, P.J., and CONOVER, J., concur.


Summaries of

National Steel Erection v. Hinkle

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District
May 16, 1990
553 N.E.2d 1252 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

National Steel Erection v. Hinkle

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL STEEL ERECTION, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT BELOW), v. KELLY E. HINKLE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District

Date published: May 16, 1990

Citations

553 N.E.2d 1252 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Hamilton v. Roger Sherman Architects

National Steel Erection v. Hinkle (1989), Ind. App., 541 N.E.2d 288, 292, reh'g. granted and clarified on…