Opinion
Submitted June 9, 1882
Decided June 20, 1882
J.P. Solomon for appellant.
George C. Lay, Jr., for respondent.
DANFORTH, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
National Shoe & Leather Bank v. Herz
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 20, 1882
89 N.Y. 629 (N.Y. 1882)
Summaries of
National Shoe & Leather Bank v. Herz
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 20, 1882
89 N.Y. 629 (N.Y. 1882)
Case details for
National Shoe & Leather Bank v. Herz
Case Details
Full title:THE NATIONAL SHOE AND LEATHER BANK OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 20, 1882
Citations
89 N.Y. 629 (N.Y. 1882)
Citing Cases
Reading Braid Co. v. Stewart
It is well settled that notice of dissolution is necessary to affect persons who have dealt with a firm; that…
Bank of Monongahela Valley v. WestonThe rule is that as to all persons who have had actual dealings with the firm, actual notice of the…