From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tak Trak, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 1, 1961
293 F.2d 270 (9th Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 17194.

August 1, 1961.

Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Jules H. Gordon, Attys. for N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Hampton and Frank Simpson, III, and David A. Maddux, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before ORR, BARNES and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.


The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter the Board) has petitioned this court for enforcement of its decree directing respondent Tak Trak to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and to reinstate twenty-three named employees.

Respondent Tak Trak discharged its entire work force shortly after a majority of the workers had signed cards authorizing representation by Painters District Council No. 36 and Its Affiliated Unions, AFL-CIO (hereinafter the union).

The Board found that respondent had violated § 8(a)(1), (3) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., because of its coercive management tactics, because of the mass discharge, and because of a failure to bargain collectively with the union.

The sole question for decision is whether or not the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence. A careful examination of the record convinces us that they are.

The petition of the Board for enforcement of its decree is granted.


Summaries of

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tak Trak, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 1, 1961
293 F.2d 270 (9th Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tak Trak, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TAK TRAK, INC., Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 1, 1961

Citations

293 F.2d 270 (9th Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

Insofar as the employer frustrated collective bargaining with respect to these concededly bargaining issues…