From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Labor Rel. Board v. B M Excavating

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 8, 1966
368 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 20936.

November 8, 1966.

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Gregory L. Hellbung, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Patrick B. Phelan, Long Beach, Cal., for respondent.

Before HAMLEY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.


The National Labor Relations Board (Board) did not err in finding and concluding that B M Excavating, Inc., is subject to the Board's jurisdiction, and that the company had violated section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 452 (1935), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158.

The Board's cease and desist order of November 23, 1965, based upon such findings and conclusions, will therefore be enforced.


Summaries of

National Labor Rel. Board v. B M Excavating

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 8, 1966
368 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

National Labor Rel. Board v. B M Excavating

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. B M EXCAVATING, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 8, 1966

Citations

368 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

N.L.R.B. v. Wilson Freight Co.

The Board also calls attention to authorities treating as protected activity under § 7 self-help efforts by…

N.L.R.B. v. Villa Avila

Enforcement of an agreement is a necessary extension of the organizational and picketing activity engaged in…