From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Eva-Ray Dress Mfg. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 17, 1951
191 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1951)

Opinion

No. 13665.

October 17, 1951.

William M. Pate, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Atlanta, Ga., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Arnold S. Kaye, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and STRUM, Circuit Judges.


Though this petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board was filed in this court on May 25, 1951, and the case was duly set by order of the court for hearing in Atlanta on October 8, 1951, and notice thereof given, no answer to the petition was filed by the respondents.

On the date set for hearing, the Board appeared by its counsel and announced ready to proceed, but the respondents appeared not, either in person or by counsel.

Whereupon the court took the petition under consideration upon the record, the brief, and the appearance of counsel for the board, and no cause of any kind having been shown why the order of the board should not be enforced as entered, and it appearing to the court from the petition and brief of the board, in the light of the record, that the petition should be granted and an appropriate decree entered directing the enforcement of the board's order, it is so ordered.


Summaries of

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Eva-Ray Dress Mfg. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 17, 1951
191 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1951)
Case details for

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Eva-Ray Dress Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. EVA-RAY DRESS MFG. CO., Inc., et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Oct 17, 1951

Citations

191 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1951)

Citing Cases

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. G & M Lath & Plaster Co.

Under these circumstances, the Board may well be entitled to enforcement of its order by default. See…

N.L.R.B. v. Filtron Company

Although such circumstances might be regarded as providing adequate basis for entry of an enforcement order…