Natera, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.

Full title: NATERA, INC., Plaintiff, v. SEQUENOM, INC. and ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

CASE NO. 12-CV-0132-SI (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12-CV-0132-SI

03-05-2013

NATERA, INC., Plaintiff, v. SEQUENOM, INC. and ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

W. PAUL SCHUCK (Cal. Bar No. 203717) SONY B BARARI (Cal. Bar No. 243379) THOMAS WHITELAW LLP CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN (Cal. Bar No. 170151) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant NATERA, INC. and Counterclaim Defendant DNA DIAGNOSTICS CENTER, INC.

SUSAN ILLSTON

W. PAUL SCHUCK (Cal. Bar No. 203717)
SONY B BARARI (Cal. Bar No. 243379)
THOMAS WHITELAW LLP
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant
NATERA, INC. and Counterclaim Defendant
DNA DIAGNOSTICS CENTER, INC.

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM

AFFILIATION AND STIPULATION FOR

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR

COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT DNA

DIAGNOSTIC CENTERS, INC.

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT Counterclaim Defendant DNA Diagnostics Centers, Inc. ("DDC") herewith substitutes:

W. Paul Schuck, Esq.
pschuck@bztm.com
Sonny B. Barari, Esq.
sbarari@bztm.com
Bartko, Zankel, Tarrant & Miller, A Professional Corporation
900 Front Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 956-1900 / Facsimile: (415) 956-1152

as counsel of record in place and instead of:

W. Paul Schuck, Esq.
Sonny B. Barari, Esq.
Thomas Whitelaw LLP
3 Embarcadero Center
Suite 1350
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 820-0400

in this matter. DDC has been advised of and consents to this substitution.

We Consent to the Foregoing Substitution.

THOMAS WHITELAW LLP

By: ______________

Joseph E. Thomas, Esq.

We Accept the Foregoing Substitution.

BARTKO ZANKEL TARRANT & MILLER

A Professional Corporation

By: _________________

W. Paul Schuck

Attestation re: Electronic Signatures

In compliance with General Order 45, § X.B, I, W. Paul Schuck, the efiler of this document hereby attest that each person whose signature block appears above has concurred in this filing.

___________

W. Paul Schuck

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

________________

THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE