Nat Friedman Son, Inc. v. City of New York

Full title: NAT FRIEDMAN SON, INC., Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court: Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1933

188 N.E. 112 (N.Y. 1933)

188 N.E. 112

Opinion

Argued October 10, 1933

Decided October 24, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel ( William H. King and Isaac Phillips of counsel), for appellant.

David Segal for respondent.

Order of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the authority of Sikora Realty Corp. v. City of New York ( 262 N.Y. 312). Question certified answered "no." No opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.