From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nashville Texas, Inc. v. City of Burleson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1210-G (N.D. Tex. Jun. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1210-G

06-26-2012

NASHVILLE TEXAS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BURLESON, TEXAS, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court. Accordingly, defendant Rovin, Inc.'s motion for attorney fees (docket entry 62), and defendant Paradigms for Success, Inc.'s motion for attorney fees (docket entry 63), both filed October 7, 2011, are DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

______________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nashville Texas, Inc. v. City of Burleson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1210-G (N.D. Tex. Jun. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Nashville Texas, Inc. v. City of Burleson

Case Details

Full title:NASHVILLE TEXAS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BURLESON, TEXAS, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 26, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1210-G (N.D. Tex. Jun. 26, 2012)

Citing Cases

Hickson v. City of Carrollton

See e.g., Elliott v. United States, No. 3:16-CV-3231-B-BT, 2019 WL 918974, at *6 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2019),…