From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nash v. Motorola Communications Electronics

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1991
328 N.C. 267 (N.C. 1991)

Summary

holding that UDTP claim based on fraud accrues when the plaintiff "discovered or should have ... discovered " the fraud

Summary of this case from Long Bros. of Summerfield, Inc. v. Hilco Transp., Inc.

Opinion

No. 568PA89

Filed 7 February 1991

ON discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, 96 N.C. App. 329, 385 S.E.2d 537 (1989), reversing a judgment entered by Owens, J., in the Superior Court, HENDERSON County on 29 June 1988. Heard in the Supreme Court 6 September 1990.

Patrick U. Smathers, P.A., by Patrick U. Smathers, for plaintiffs appellees.

Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes and Davis, P.A., by Roy W. Davis, Jr. and Michelle Rippon, for defendants appellants.


Affirmed.

Justice MARTIN did not participate in this decision.


Summaries of

Nash v. Motorola Communications Electronics

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1991
328 N.C. 267 (N.C. 1991)

holding that UDTP claim based on fraud accrues when the plaintiff "discovered or should have ... discovered " the fraud

Summary of this case from Long Bros. of Summerfield, Inc. v. Hilco Transp., Inc.
Case details for

Nash v. Motorola Communications Electronics

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDE E. NASH AND JANIS WESSOLLECK v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS AND…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1991

Citations

328 N.C. 267 (N.C. 1991)
400 S.E.2d 36

Citing Cases

In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.

hods"); DeCoursey v. Am. Gen. Life Ins. Co., 822 F.3d 469, 474 (8th Cir. 2016) (explaining that, among…

Wysong and Miles Co. v. Employers of Wausau

See N.C.G.S. § 75-16.2. A cause of action under this statute based on an alleged fraud accrues, like a common…