From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nasal v. Dover

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 9, 2008
885 N.E.2d 236 (Ohio 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 2006-2220 and 2006-2311.

Submitted March 12, 2008.

Decided April 9, 2008.

APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Miami County, No. 2006-CA-9, 169 Ohio App.3d 262, 2006-Ohio-5584.

Gary A. Nasal, Miami County Prosecuting Attorney, and James R. Dicks Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Marc Dann, Attorney General, Stephen P. Carney, Deputy Solicitor, and Frank M. Strigari, Assistant Attorney General, urging reversal for amicus curiae Attorney General of Ohio.


{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Hyle v. Porter, 117 Ohio St.3d 165, 2008-Ohio-542, 882 N.E.2d 899.

MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

O'DONNELL, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Nasal v. Dover

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 9, 2008
885 N.E.2d 236 (Ohio 2008)
Case details for

Nasal v. Dover

Case Details

Full title:NASAL, PROS. ATTY., APPELLANT, v. DOVER, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 9, 2008

Citations

885 N.E.2d 236 (Ohio 2008)
885 N.E.2d 236
2008 Ohio 1592

Citing Cases

Watkins v. Stevey

Id. at ¶ 6 23. The Supreme Court of Ohio, in Nasal v. Dover, 117 Ohio St.3d 531, 2008-Ohio-1592, affirmed…

O'brien v. Hill.

In either scenario, the statute has been considered improperly applied retroactively. See Nasal v. Burge, 2d…