From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Napolitano v. N.Y. Grievance Comm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 2006
33 A.D.3d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2006-00716.

October 31, 2006.

In a claim to recover damages related to a disciplinary proceeding instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Scuccimarra, J.), dated May 6, 2005, which, inter alia, granted the motion of the defendant State of New York to dismiss the claim.

Before: Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent State of New York.

The Court of Claims properly found that the claim was time-barred, as any alleged wrong occurred at the date of the claimant's suspension in May 2001 ( see Court of Claims Act § 10 [3]; CPLR 214), and further that the claimant failed to adequately describe the nature of his claim ( see Court of Claims Act § 11 [b]).

The claimant's remaining contentions are without merit.

[ See 8 Misc 3d 1007(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 50982(U) (2005).]


Summaries of

Napolitano v. N.Y. Grievance Comm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 2006
33 A.D.3d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Napolitano v. N.Y. Grievance Comm

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. NAPOLITANO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 31, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7859
822 N.Y.S.2d 712

Citing Cases

Maureen McNamara v. State of New York

The authority to conduct attorney disciplinary proceedings is vested exclusively in the Appellate Divisions…