From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naples v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 16, 2014
Case No. 13-11257 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 16, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 13-11257

01-16-2014

LIZA NAPLES, Plaintiff, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Defendant.


Honorable Thomas L. Ludington


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Liza Naples filed a complaint alleging that Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) negligently failed in its "duty to protect [her] from any hidden or latent hazards on its air plane." Pl.'s Compl. 31, 33, attached as Notice Removal, ECF No. 1. Delta filed a motion for summary judgment on October 25, 2013. The motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

On December 30, 2013, Judge Binder issued a report recommending that Delta's motion for summary judgment be granted and that the case be dismissed. Although Judge Binder's report explicitly stated that the parties may object to and seek review of the recommendation within 14 days of service of the report, as of today's date, neither party has filed objections. The failure to object to Judge Binder's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Moreover, the failure to file objections to the report waives any further right to appeal. See Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Judge Binder's report and recommendation, ECF No. 25, is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Delta's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 10, is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that Naples's two motions to compel, ECF Nos. 11 and 17, are DENIED as moot.

Judge Binder filed a notice on the docket concerning these two discovery motions. He indicates that if his report and recommendation is adopted, "the discovery motions presently pending before the Court will be moot." Notice 1, ECF No. 26. As the Court is adopting Judge Binder's report, these motions are appropriately denied.

It is further ORDERED that the complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice.

__________

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on January 16, 2014.

__________

TRACY A. JACOBS


Summaries of

Naples v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 16, 2014
Case No. 13-11257 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Naples v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LIZA NAPLES, Plaintiff, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 16, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-11257 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 16, 2014)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

In fact, as discussed infra with respect to Delta's preemption argument, courts have found that Congress…