From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nanstad v. Northern States Power Company

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 9, 2007
Civ. No. 06-3087 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 9, 2007)

Opinion

Civ. No. 06-3087 (JNE/JJG).

February 9, 2007


ORDER


In a Report and Recommendation dated January 16, 2007, the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that plaintiff's motion to remand to state court be granted and that plaintiff's request for an order requiring payment of costs and expenses incurred as a result of removal be denied. Defendants objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's motion to remand to state court [Docket No. 4] is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff's request for costs and fees is DENIED.
3. This case is remanded to the state court from which it was removed.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Nanstad v. Northern States Power Company

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 9, 2007
Civ. No. 06-3087 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Nanstad v. Northern States Power Company

Case Details

Full title:Tom Nanstad, Plaintiff, v. Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 9, 2007

Citations

Civ. No. 06-3087 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 9, 2007)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Master Sec. Co., LLC

An argument can be made, though, that this conclusion was not obvious because other district courts—including…

Thompson v. Hibbing Taconite Holding Company

"Such claims must be resolved through the grievance and arbitration procedures contained in the [CBA] or…