concluding that the 2009 case was not an action upon the 2008 judgment and it had otherwise expired, and Cheyenne and Lewis could not seek consequential damages for breach of the duty to defend based on an expired judgment
Summary of this case from Nalder v. LewisNo. 70504
09-20-2019
James NALDER, Guardian Ad Litem ON BEHALF OF Cheyenne NALDER; and Gary Lewis, Individually, Appellants, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
Answer.
concluding that the 2009 case was not an action upon the 2008 judgment and it had otherwise expired, and Cheyenne and Lewis could not seek consequential damages for breach of the duty to defend based on an expired judgment
Summary of this case from Nalder v. LewisFull title:JAMES NALDER, GUARDIAN AD LITEM ON BEHALF OF CHEYENNE NALDER; AND GARY…
Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Date published: Sep 20, 2019
Appx. at 349 (citing Nalder v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 449 P.3d 1268, 2019 WL 5260073, at *2 (Nev.…
Nalder v. United Auto. Ins. Co.Nalder v. United Auto. Ins. Co., No. 2:09-cv-1348-RCJ-GWF, 2013 WL 5882472 (D. Nev. Oct. 30, 2013). On…