From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nakano v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 10, 1983
698 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1983)

Opinion

No. 81-4042.

February 10, 1983.

James J. Brosnahan, Morrison Foerster, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

Sanford Svetcov, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before ANDERSON, ALARCON and POOLE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Our order of February 23, 1981, reversed the district court's order which had purported to disqualify the law firm of Morrison Foerster from representing the appellants.

Subsequent to our order above the district court permitted the law firm to continue their representation. The case now having been concluded, and the problem being unlikely to again arise, we dismiss the appeal as moot.


Summaries of

Nakano v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 10, 1983
698 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1983)
Case details for

Nakano v. United States

Case Details

Full title:IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS: RE APPEARANCES OF WITNESSES NAKANO, AMANO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 10, 1983

Citations

698 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1983)

Citing Cases

Canez v. Guerrero

noted, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 1180, 75 L.Ed.2d 429 (1983). The court has no jurisdiction to hear any case in…