From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Najdl v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 18, 2022
1:21-cv-1578 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 18, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-1578

07-18-2022

JOHN R. NAJDL, PLAINTIFF, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HONORABLE SARA LIOI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 8, 2022, Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay filed his Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 13) with respect to plaintiff John R. Najdl's complaint for judicial review of defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration's determination with respect to Najdl's application for disability insurance benefits.

The R&R concludes that the Commissioner erred by finding that a prior Administrative Law Judge's (“ALJ”) residual functional capacity (“RFC”) determination was still binding and precluded a finding of disability. As a result of this error, the R&R further concludes that Najdl was not afforded the de novo review of the medical evidence to which he was entitled. The ALJ's January 19, 2021 determination became the Commissioner's final decision by virtue of the Appeals Council's denial of Najdl's request for review. (Doc. No. 13 at 2.)

The R&R recommends that the Commissioner's determination be reversed and that the matter be remanded for further proceedings; in particular, the R&R directs that “[t]he ALJ should review [Najdl's] records again, but without a presumption that the prior ALJ's RFC is proper until the evidence establishes a significant change in condition.” (Doc. No. 13 at 20.)

Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2), any party may file objections to an R&R. Properly filed objections are given de novo review by this Court. See also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); LR 72.3(b).

On July 15, 2022, defendant Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Kilolo Kijakazi, filed a response to the R&R indicating that the Commissioner “will not be filing objections to this Honorable Court's Report and Recommended Decision.”

Accordingly, no objections having been heard, the R&R, which this Court finds to be properly reasoned, is adopted. The Commissioner's decision is reversed and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. This case is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Najdl v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 18, 2022
1:21-cv-1578 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Najdl v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN R. NAJDL, PLAINTIFF, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 18, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-1578 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 18, 2022)

Citing Cases

Neal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Subsequent to Earley, district courts in the Sixth Circuit have disagreed as to whether an ALJ faced with a…