From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naiman v. Naiman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1949
276 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

December 19, 1949.


In an action for a separation, order denying appellant's motion to compel the respondent to accept appellant's notice of appeal from the judgment, affirmed, without costs. Under section 578-a of the Civil Practice Act, the first significant time to determine is the time of expiration of the right to appeal by the party seeking a ten-day extension. The appellant's time within which to appeal started running on January 18th, with the entry of judgment ( People ex rel. Manhattan Stor. Warehouse Co. v. Lilly, 299 N.Y. 281), and expired on February 17th. Respondent served his notice of appeal thereafter. Appellant served her notice of appeal still later, but within ten days of the service of respondent's notice of appeal. A party, bound by automatic entry of the judgment, does not extend his time to appeal by mailing a copy of the judgment and notice of entry to his adversary. Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Naiman v. Naiman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1949
276 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Naiman v. Naiman

Case Details

Full title:BLANCHE NAIMAN, Appellant, v. SAMUEL NAIMAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1949

Citations

276 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)