From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N. J. v. Regency Leasing Systems

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 1997
237 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 17, 1997.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a loan and security agreement, the defendant Jerry Kessler appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered March 21, 1996, which denied his motion pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 724 for indemnification pendente lite from the defendant Regency Leasing Systems, Inc., for expenses incurred in the action.

Before: Friedmann, J.P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Inasmuch as the action against the defendant Jerry Kessler is based upon a personal guaranty, the action is not brought against him "by reason of the fact that he * * * was a director or officer of the corporation" within the meaning of that phrase as employed in Business Corporation Law § 722 (a). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion seeking indemnification pendente lite pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 724 ( see, Dankoff v Bowling Props. Assn., 69 Misc 2d 658, 660; Spring v Moncrieff, 10 Misc 2d 731; Matter of Keating Co., 180 Bankr 18, 24-25; see also, 3 White, New York Corporations § 722.01, at 7-361 [13th ed]; Bishop, Law of Corporate Officers and Directors — Indemnification and Insurance § 3.11, at 66).


Summaries of

N. J. v. Regency Leasing Systems

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 1997
237 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

N. J. v. Regency Leasing Systems

Case Details

Full title:TILDEN OF NEW JERSEY, INC., Respondent, v. REGENCY LEASING SYSTEMS, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 962

Citing Cases

In re Pittsburgh Brewing Company, Inc.

s made a party " by reason of the fact that the person is or was a[n] . . . officer . . . of the…

Golisano v. Turek

BlueTie cites to case law in support of its position that an individual guarantor cannot seek indemnification…