N. Ala. Express v. Interstate Commerce Comm

Full title: NORTH ALABAMA EXPRESS., AN ALABAMA CORPORATION; AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jun 30, 1993

996 F.2d 1072 (11th Cir. 1993)

Opinion

No. 91-7662.

June 30, 1993.

George M. Boles, Weaver, Boles Elmore, Birmingham, AL., for Neely North Alabama Exp.

Robert C. Black, Montgomery, AL, for AAA Cooper.

Suellen Powers Lambert, Alabama Public Service Com'n, Montgomery, AL, for Alabama Public Service Com'n-internor.

Gerald D. Colvin, Jr., Bishop, Colvin, Johnson Kent, Birmingham, AL, for Milan Exp., Inc.

Sidney L. Strickland, Secretary, I.C.C., Michael Martin, U.S. Atty. Gen., Robert B. Nicholson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for I.C.C. U.S.A.

Robert L. Baker, Buck Baker, Nashville, TN, for Averitt Exp., Inc.

Kim D. Mann, Shawn, Berger Mann, Washington, DC, for Deaton, Inc.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Interstate Commerce Commission.

(ICC No. MC-F-19804.)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion Sept. 3, 1992, 11th Cir., 971 F.2d 661)

Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, RONEY^_ and GIBSON^__, Senior Circuit Judges.

_ See Rule 34-2(b), Rules of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

__ Honorable Floyd R. Gibson, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The following sentence is withdrawn from our opinion in this case:

For instance, the ICC could not approve the transfer of intrastate routes in Alabama if the only other aspects of the transaction involved interstate routes between Oregon and California.

North Alabama Exp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 971 F.2d 661, 665 (11th Cir. 1992). Otherwise, the petitions for rehearing filed by respondent Interstate Commerce Commission and intervening respondent Averitt Express, Inc. are denied.